June 25, 2025, marks a somber anniversary in Kenya—a year since the tragic yet transformative protests against the 2024 finance bill, which almost passed into law, threatening economic freedom. Despite the president withholding his assent, the events that unfolded have left a deep scar on the nation, characterized by loss of life, police brutality, and ongoing civil unrest.

One year later, the wounds are far from healed. The commemoration turned into a fierce protest, drawing not only the youth but Kenyans from all walks of life, signaling a broad discontent with the current governance. The past year has seen a frightening disregard for the rule of law, highlighted by the death of Albert Ojwang, a teacher and vocal critic of the police on social media, who died under mysterious circumstances in police custody. His death, and the lack of accountability thereafter, underscores a grim reality—some are above the law in Kenya.

The recent protests were marred by violence, including allegations of goons hired by local government to disrupt the peace. Tragically, a mask seller was shot dead by the police, a stark reminder of the ongoing struggle between state power and civic freedom.

Despite these challenges, the spirit of resistance among Kenyans has only strengthened. Posters and programs for the protests circulated widely on social media, calling for significant action including a march to the State House. The heavy police presence and barricades around key buildings like the Parliament did little to deter the demonstrators, who gathered in large numbers across various cities.

However, the day was also marked by a significant clampdown on media freedom. The Communications Authority of Kenya issued a directive to halt live broadcast of the protests, citing potential incitement to violence—a move that many viewed as an infringement on press freedom. This led to a blackout on traditional media outlets, with citizens turning to social media to document and share updates, a move reminiscent of past protests where hashtags turned into banners of resistance.

Despite not reaching the State House as planned, the resolve of the Kenyan people remains unshaken. The court later issued a stay against the Communications Authority’s directive, a small but significant victory for freedom of expression.

This continued struggle highlights a critical juncture in Kenya’s democracy where the fight for justice and accountability is clashing with an increasingly authoritarian state response. The legacy of those lost in the struggle and the ongoing injustices serve as a potent reminder of the need for systemic change. As the nation moves forward, the determination to mend the fabric of Kenyan society only grows stronger, fueled by the courage of its citizens who demand a just and equitable system.