In an alarming trend that underscores growing concerns about the safety of the judiciary, the number of threats against federal judges in the United States has surged to record levels in 2025. According to recent data released by the US Marshals Service, the frequency and severity of these threats have escalated, affecting an increasing number of judges across the country.

As of this fiscal year, which still has three months remaining, the US Marshals Service has logged a staggering number of threats, surpassing the total count recorded in the entire 2022 fiscal year. This year alone, 297 federal judges have been targeted, highlighting the growing challenge of ensuring judicial security and the well-being of those tasked with upholding the law.

The rise in threats against federal judges is not just a statistic; it represents a profound challenge to the principles of justice and the safety of individuals serving in one of the three pillars of American democracy. The threats vary in nature but are uniformly intended to intimidate and influence the decision-making process within the judiciary.

This alarming trend has prompted federal law enforcement agencies, including the US Marshals Service, to enhance security measures for judges and their families. Efforts to safeguard those who serve on the bench have intensified, with increased security protocols at courthouses and for individual judges, both during and outside of official duties.

The judiciary's response has been measured yet resolute. Judicial officials have called for greater awareness and stronger legislation to protect judges and prevent such threats from undermining the justice system. Legal experts and advocates for judicial independence assert that the ability of judges to perform their duties without fear of personal harm is fundamental to a functioning democracy.

As the fiscal year progresses, the focus on the safety of federal judges remains a top priority for law enforcement and judicial administration alike. The increase in threats not only affects the individuals targeted but also poses a broader risk to the integrity and independence of the judicial system. The ongoing efforts to address and mitigate these threats are crucial in preserving the rule of law and ensuring that justice is administered without fear or favor.