On a recent whirlwind tour of Los Angeles, Vice President JD Vance’s actions seemed more aligned with political theater than with the purported administrative duties of his visit. His packed schedule on June 20 included a mere four and a half hours on the ground, yet the impact and the controversy of his visit linger far beyond his physical presence.

Vance's itinerary began with a rapid succession of events: a brief stop at a federal operations center, a quick press conference, and an appearance at a Republican National Committee event. His tight schedule begs the question: was this trip about effective governance, or was it a stage for political provocation?

Critics argue that Vance, known for his aggressive political style, continues to embody the confrontational politics characteristic of the current administration. His visit was punctuated by incendiary remarks and actions that seemed designed to stir conflict rather than foster any semblance of peace or stability. For instance, not two minutes into his press conference, Vance launched into a tirade against California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, accusing them of promoting illegal migration and violence.

The Vice President's approach starkly contrasts with historical expectations of governmental leadership aimed at unifying and uplifting the nation. His tactics appear to be a far cry from the philosophies of past leaders like James Madison, who emphasized the importance of statesmanship, or Theodore Roosevelt, who valued the character and dignity of leadership.

Furthermore, Vance's recent interactions on the international stage have mirrored his domestic approach. At the Munich Security Conference, he did not hesitate to criticize European leaders, accusing them of failing to protect free speech and manage migration effectively. His speech, laden with contentious statements, left many in shock, underscoring his preference for confrontation over diplomacy.

Back in the U.S., Vance's missteps continued. In a significant faux pas, he misnamed California Senator Alex Padilla as "Jose Padilla," associating him with a convicted terrorist. This blunder not only sparked accusations of racism but also highlighted Vance's frequent resort to personal attacks against his political opponents.

These actions underscore a broader pattern: under Vance's vice presidency, governance seems to be less about public service and more about the perpetuation of division. His tactics resonate with a segment of the political landscape that thrives on conflict and controversy, but they fall short of the leadership needed to address the true needs of the American people.

As the political landscape continues to evolve, the repercussions of Vance's approach remain to be seen. However, the current trajectory suggests a continued departure from the ideals of unity and constructive governance once championed by America's revered leaders. This shift not only challenges the fabric of American democracy but also calls into question the long-term implications of a governance style rooted in provocation and divisiveness.