In a striking move, Pam Bondi, has terminated the recently appointed First Assistant, Alina Habba’s replacement, underlining a misunderstanding regarding the responsibilities tied to the role. This decision highlights ongoing turbulence within Bondi's team, raising questions about the stability and clarity of leadership in her office. More details on this development can be found on Politico's recent coverage.

Meanwhile, contrasting views from the Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's credibility have surfaced. Under the first Trump administration, Maxwell was labeled untrustworthy, yet the current DOJ appears to be reevaluating her reliability. This shift has sparked intrigue about the potential implications for ongoing cases linked to Maxwell. MSNBC provides an in-depth look at this evolving story.

On the legal front, while major global law firms have shown reluctance to oppose Trump, smaller practices have been notably defiant. This resistance among smaller entities underscores a David versus Goliath scenario in the legal realm, as detailed in a recent New York Times article.

Judicial setbacks have also made headlines as attempts by the DOJ to unseal records related to Jeffrey Epstein were thwarted by judges, citing insufficient grounds presented by the Trump administration. The New York Law Journal discusses the judges’ rationale and the broader implications of this failed effort.

In a less conventional confrontation, a man armed with a knife caused a lockdown at a Chicago courthouse, a risky move considering the heavy security typically present in such facilities. Bloomberg Law News has the full story on this alarming incident.

The legal system faced another blow with the DC Circuit ruling against a lawsuit addressing cocoa slave labor. This decision marks a significant setback in the fight against forced labor practices in the cocoa industry, as reported by Law360.

Lastly, the White House continues to face criticism over its selective media access policy, following a court decision allowing the administration to continue barring certain media outlets. Critics argue this practice undermines democratic principles by manipulating press coverage. Reuters explores the ramifications of this ongoing media struggle.

For more detailed discussions on these legal battles and administrative controversies, visit Above the Law’s comprehensive report in their latest Morning Docket.