July 23, 2025

In a revealing twist that highlights the often opaque nature of law firm politics, Ryan Powers, a former associate at Davis Polk, has come forward to shed light on the firm’s quiet shift towards supporting former President Donald Trump, despite its public commitment to socially progressive causes. Powers, who was terminated from the firm after his political op-eds, has ignited a conversation about the firm's true alignments and the broader implications for its public image and internal culture.
Powers’ critique emerges from a firm that boasts of its dedication to diversity, equity, and inclusion on multiple web pages. However, according to Powers, significant actions such as a deal with Trump Media and subtle rollbacks on DEI initiatives were never openly discussed within the firm. This discrepancy between the firm's public facade and its internal decisions has stirred not only controversy but also a dialogue on the authenticity of corporate commitments to social justice.
The situation took a more personal turn when Vivia Chen of the Ex-Careerist commented on the issue, suggesting that Davis Polk’s alignment with Trumpian values was hardly subtle, prompting a broader evaluation of Powers’ actions—whether they stem from heroism, naivety, or mere annoyance. Embracing these labels, Powers now describes himself as “Heroic, naive and annoying” on his social media, indicating a complex interplay between personal convictions and professional repercussions.
This incident raises critical questions about the transparency and integrity of law firms that claim to champion progressive values while potentially harboring contrasting political affiliations. For industry onlookers and the public alike, Powers’ revelations offer a rare glimpse into the inner workings of a prestigious law firm and challenge other legal institutions to reflect on the alignment between their public values and private dealings.
As the legal community and its observers continue to dissect the implications of such revelations, the conversation about genuine commitment to social justice versus corporate posturing remains pertinent. Ryan Powers’ bold move to spotlight these tensions at Davis Polk underscores the ongoing struggle within the legal profession to reconcile profit-making with principled stances on societal issues.