The Ninth Circuit Court has once again read the 14th Amendment as it stands, blocking a controversial order from President Trump aimed at curtailing birthright citizenship. This decision, reported by Reuters on July 24, 2025, underscores the ongoing judicial resistance to changes in constitutional interpretations without legislative approval.

In another legal front, the Trump administration's attempt to weaken union powers has met with failure. According to Bloomberg Law, a second judge has dismissed a lawsuit from the Trump administration that sought to nullify union contracts, marking yet another legal setback for efforts to reduce union influence in labor markets.

A Wall Street Journal report has revealed that the FBI had informed former President Trump about his mention in the Epstein investigation files months before it became public knowledge. This disclosure adds another layer to Trump's already tumultuous political landscape, as he navigates through various legal and personal crises.

Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan has openly criticized the majority of the Supreme Court, as detailed in a Law and Crime article. Her frustration stems from what she perceives as under-reasoned orders that continue to favor the Trump administration's efforts to purge Biden appointees from governmental positions.

A federal judge has taken significant steps to protect Kilmar Abrego Garcia from potential injustices under the Trump administration's policies, HuffPost reports. The judge’s order not only demands Garcia's release but also prohibits immediate re-arrest, setting a precedent for similar cases in the future.

Lastly, Columbia University has reached a settlement with the Trump administration, Politico reports. This agreement aims to end what the university described as "sustained federal scrutiny and institutional uncertainty," though details of the settlement have not been fully disclosed.

In a series of legal battles and administrative maneuvers, the resilience of judicial and institutional structures is being tested under the Trump administration’s contentious policies and actions. Each case not only highlights the complexities of legal interpretations and the importance of judicial oversight but also reflects the deeply polarized political environment in the United States.