"What’s been written off as a joke by many people is actually a traumatic experience." — Plaintiff in Cardi B mic-throwing lawsuit

What started as a viral clip of Cardi B defending herself from a flying drink at a Las Vegas performance has escalated into a legal showdown. The Grammy-winning artist is now facing a civil lawsuit in Clark County, Nevada, for battery, assault, and negligence after allegedly throwing a microphone at a concertgoer during her July 29, 2023, show at Drai’s Beachclub.

A Splash, a Microphone, and a Lawsuit

The plaintiff, Jane Doe, claims she was simply participating in the interactive concert atmosphere when her action of tossing a small amount of water towards the stage prompted Cardi B to retaliate. The thrown microphone allegedly struck Doe, leading to "emotional distress, humiliation, and physical injury." This incident was captured on video and sparked widespread debate on social media over the boundaries of performer and audience interactions.

Las Vegas police initially opened a criminal battery investigation but closed it citing insufficient evidence. However, the civil lawsuit persists.

What Law Did Cardi B Allegedly Break?

Despite the lack of criminal charges, the civil case presses on under Nevada law. Battery, in a civil context, requires proof of intentional and offensive contact. If it’s determined that Cardi B intended to throw the microphone in a harmful manner, she could be found liable for civil battery. The lawsuit also includes claims of assault—defined as placing another in apprehension of immediate harm—and negligence, both by Cardi B and Drai's management for not ensuring adequate safety measures.

Who's At Fault—And What Could Happen?

The court will consider the intent behind Cardi B's actions, whether her response was proportional to the fan's actions, and whether the venue should have intervened. Potential liabilities could include compensatory damages for medical costs and pain, and possibly punitive damages if the act is deemed egregious.

Could Self-Defense Apply?

Cardi B’s defense might argue the microphone throwing was an instinctive act of self-defense against what she perceived as an assault from the thrown drink. However, the principle of self-defense requires the response to be reasonable and proportional, which the court will need to assess.

The Venue’s Legal Exposure

Drai’s Management Group also faces allegations of negligence for failing to prevent the incident despite a similar occurrence the previous night. They may share in the financial liabilities if found at fault under Nevada premises liability law.

Key Legal Takeaways

The incident underscores that civil claims for battery and assault can proceed independently of criminal charges. Nevada law supports claims based on actual contact or even the threat of harm, and highlights the critical need for proportionality in self-defense, particularly when public figures are involved.

FAQ: Cardi B Lawsuit and the Laws Behind It

Was Cardi B charged with a crime? No, due to insufficient evidence. Can someone sue a celebrity for being hit at a concert? Yes, under civil law for intentional or negligent harm. What statute defines battery in Nevada? NRS 200.481. What damages could Cardi B face? Both compensatory and punitive damages, depending on court findings.

📝 Related Reading

Interested in more high-profile legal showdowns and the laws behind them? Explore trademark disputes, financial mysteries, and IP theft in the entertainment world, and learn about the legal aftermath of infamous criminal cases.