July 31, 2025

The July bar exam has come and gone, leaving many to ponder not just their future careers but the broader implications of artificial intelligence (AI) in the legal field. As we delve into this era of technological advancement, the question looms: Are AI developments enhancing the legal profession, or are they a threat to the traditional roles of attorneys?
In an age where legal research was synonymous with library visits and manual case sorting, today’s newcomers are navigating a vastly different landscape. The integration of AI in legal practices has transformed mundane tasks and complex analytics, leading to both efficiencies and new challenges. For instance, AI’s capacity to draft documents and perform legal research has fundamentally shifted the skill set required from upcoming lawyers. Yet, despite these advancements, AI is not without its faults—prone to errors and so-called "AI hallucinations" that can mislead and cause judicial confusion.
Recent legal mishaps underscore the risks associated with AI dependency. A notable case involved three lawyers who faced severe repercussions due to reliance on AI-generated information. This incident has sparked debates about the adequacy of current legal frameworks and malpractice insurance in covering AI-related errors.
Yet, despite these challenges, AI's potential to handle repetitive tasks could allow lawyers to focus more on aspects of their profession that necessitate human judgment, empathy, and ethical considerations—qualities yet unreachable by machines. According to E.M. Forster's plea for human connection in "Howard's End," and reflected in the realm of law, the essence of lawyering transcends mere technical competency.
Looking ahead, the legal profession stands at a crossroads. Mary Meeker's "Trends in Artificial Intelligence" report suggests that understanding and adapting to AI is inevitable. The future of lawyering may well involve a blend of human and artificial intelligence, where both complement each other to enhance the delivery of legal services.
As we speculate on the next five to ten years, questions remain about AI's role in business development, client relationships, and even courtrooms. Could AI evolve to manage disputes or even replace certain judicial functions? The answers may hinge on how well the legal community can integrate AI without compromising the core values and personal touch that define the profession.
In conclusion, while AI continues to reshape the legal landscape, its true impact will depend on our ability to harness its potential responsibly while maintaining the indispensable human elements of the legal profession. As technology advances, so too must our understanding and ethical frameworks, ensuring that AI serves as a tool for enhancement rather than an uncontrollable disruptor.