In the fast-paced world of technology, the term "agentic" is buzzing with promises of transforming AI into autonomous agents capable of independent decision-making. This concept suggests a leap from simple task automation to AI systems that can independently navigate complex tasks like managing cybersecurity or scheduling personal activities without human intervention.

However, the legal industry remains skeptical about the practical application of agentic AI. The inherent risks associated with giving AI autonomous control, especially in sensitive areas like legal proceedings or personal data handling, make it a hard sell. The term has been criticized for being an empty buzzword, more about hype than substance, and could potentially lead to misguided expectations about what AI can or should do.

Recent technology conferences and industry discussions, like those at ILTACON, have showcased products labeled as "agentic" that seem to extend not much beyond sophisticated automation systems. Companies like Thomson Reuters and Lexis have introduced tools that automate complex tasks using various models, yet these do not fulfill the agentic promise of AI operating with complete autonomy.

The legal sector's cautious approach is understandable given the potential consequences of misapplied AI. An AI system might, for instance, settle a lawsuit prematurely or misinterpret legal documents, leading to severe repercussions for clients and law firms alike—scenarios that border on professional malpractice.

Despite these challenges, not all hope is lost for the integration of more advanced AI in legal tech. Solutions that enhance cybersecurity measures or streamline billing processes are welcomed, as long as they don't overstep into making unguided legal decisions.

The industry's dilemma lies between adopting cutting-edge technology and adhering to the rigorous, conservative nature of legal practice. While tech companies push for innovation, they must also reassure legal professionals that these new tools will support rather than disrupt established practices.

As the legal tech community navigates these waters, it's crucial to maintain a balanced perspective. Agentic AI, as it stands, may be more of a marketing term than a reality, and its potential to revolutionize the legal industry remains to be seen. For now, lawyers can continue to rely on advancements that provide practical, reliable support without overstepping into the realm of autonomous decision-making. As with all buzzwords, the shine of "agentic" will likely fade, replaced by the next big term—unless the bubble bursts first.