September 7, 2025

In a strong rebuke of recent U.S. policies, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk demanded on Friday that the United States immediately rescind sanctions placed on three Palestinian human rights organizations. According to Türk, these sanctions on groups like Al-Haq, the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, and Al-Mezan Center for Human Rights are "completely unacceptable" and hinder crucial human rights accountability efforts in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.
The sanctioned entities have been instrumental in documenting and advocating against human rights abuses in the region. Türk emphasized the importance of their work, especially "when international humanitarian and human rights laws are being systematically violated in Gaza and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem."
This call from the UN's human rights chief comes as part of a broader critique of U.S. actions that also include past sanctions against UN officials and International Criminal Court (ICC) judges and prosecutors involved in examining the situation in Palestine. Türk warned that these U.S. measures could have a "chilling effect" on civil society efforts not only in Palestine but globally, undermining essential human rights advocacy.
The announcement aligns with escalating tensions and deteriorating conditions in Gaza, where an ongoing Israeli offensive has drastically intensified, aiming to take complete control of Gaza City. UN spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric highlighted the dire humanitarian situation, noting significant civilian casualties and the displacement of nearly 41,000 residents amid continuous bombardment.
In addition to these sanctions, the U.S. has also been criticized by the European Union for recent visa bans imposed on Palestinian Authority officials, which the EU claims violate international law and the terms of the UN Headquarters Agreement. The EU has urged a reversal of this decision, especially in light of the upcoming UN General Assembly where Palestinian representation is crucial.
As international scrutiny increases, the global community watches closely, hoping for a reconsideration of policies that impact both the humanitarian situation on the ground and the broader framework of international human rights law.