September 9, 2025


Legal and Political Shakeup: Supreme Court Decision, Book Reviews, and Biglaw Shifts

In a controversial decision that has sparked widespread debate, the U.S. Supreme Court has authorized the Trump administration to begin racially profiling Latinos and individuals perceived to be Latino. This move, emerging from the court's shadow docket, intensifies concerns about racial discrimination and civil rights abuses under the current administration. Critics argue that this sets a dangerous precedent for law enforcement practices nationwide.

In literary circles, Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s latest book has been met with lukewarm reviews, described by NY Times critic Jennifer Szalai as "studiously bland." This commentary suggests Barrett is attempting to carve out a cautious, non-controversial image amidst an increasingly polarized political landscape.

Legal dynamics continue to evolve as a state judge, recently confirmed to the federal bench, ruled in favor of former President Trump in a lawsuit against the Pulitzer Prize board. The suit was filed over awards given to journalism that Trump deemed unfavorable to him, raising questions about the influence of political figures over legal rulings and journalistic freedoms.

Meanwhile, major law firms, previously hesitant to engage with Trump-related business, have begun accepting work from Trump Media. The American Lawyer notes this shift may signify a pragmatic adaptation to the evolving political and business climates, prioritizing profitability and client diversity.

The business sector is facing its own challenges, particularly concerning cybersecurity. Bloomberg Law News reports growing apprehension among companies that federal employee reductions could weaken the private sector's ability to protect against cyber threats. This comes at a time when digital security is more critical than ever.

In a notable legal victory, E. Jean Carroll's defamation award against Trump was upheld on appeal, affirming the $83.3 million penalty in the high-profile sexual assault case. This decision marks a significant moment in the ongoing discussions about accountability and justice in cases involving high-profile figures.

Lastly, the legal and academic communities bid farewell to the TaxProf Blog, a staple in legal blogging for over two decades. The blog's closure marks the end of an era for an influential voice in legal education and discourse.

As the legal and political landscapes continue to shift, these developments underscore the complex interplay of law, politics, and society. Each story reflects broader themes of accountability, justice, and the ever-changing dynamics of power in America.