September 11, 2025


Effective Advocacy in the Modern Courtroom: Insights from Barrister Emily Windsor

Since becoming a member of the Bar of England and Wales in the 1990s, Emily Windsor has honed her courtroom skills across countless trials and hearings, developing a keen understanding of what captures a judge's attention. In an era where courtrooms are increasingly digital, Windsor’s experience offers a valuable perspective on effective legal advocacy.

"Ethical conduct is vital," Windsor emphasizes. She insists that a barrister’s primary responsibility is to the court and the administration of justice. Judges rely on barristers for accurate information and efficient proceedings, expecting nothing less than complete honesty and integrity. These expectations are enshrined in professional conduct rules, demanding barristers maintain independence, protect client confidentiality, and prioritize the court's interests alongside those of their clients.

Over her career, Windsor has appeared before many of the same judges, building a reputation that, she notes, can be jeopardized by even a single lapse in professionalism. "Memories are long, and integrity matters," she states, highlighting the long-lasting impact of every court interaction.

Preparation, according to Windsor, is another cornerstone of effective advocacy. She meticulously prepares for each case, understanding that thorough preparation demonstrates respect for the court’s time—an aspect judges deeply appreciate. In today's digital age, this also means mastering technology for remote hearings, from ensuring stable internet connections to managing digital documents effectively. "Technical competence is now part of professional competence," Windsor asserts.

In terms of courtroom communication, Windsor stresses the importance of clarity and structure. With the shift to remote hearings, she observes that clear, deliberate speech helps mitigate technological delays and aids judges in understanding complex legal arguments. She has adapted her delivery to include more explicit signposting of arguments, which helps maintain the flow and structure of her submissions.

Windsor's background in debate and her academic pursuits in English and history have equipped her with formidable skills in crafting and delivering arguments. She believes these foundational skills are crucial in legal advocacy, where the ability to think on one's feet and marshal coherent arguments can determine the outcome of a case.

In conclusion, Windsor’s insights reflect a blend of traditional values and modern adaptability, illustrating the evolving nature of legal practice. Her emphasis on integrity, preparation, and clear communication serves as a guide for barristers navigating the complexities of today’s legal landscape.