Decades ago, the role of a judge was coveted, symbolizing the pinnacle of a legal career. Back then, judges were predominantly white males, members of exclusive clubs, and could often be found leaving court early for golf if their dockets were clear. The respect and prestige associated with the black robe and the title "Your Honor" were deemed ample compensation for earnings less than those of law firm associates.

But today, one must wonder: is the allure of being a judge worth the potential perils? The job has always demanded hard work, but now, with increasing verbal and physical threats—including some judges facing dire consequences for their rulings—the risks are undeniably higher.

District Court Judge Thomas Cullen, a Trump appointee, has openly criticized the unprecedented attacks on judges by executive officials, describing them as "left-wing," "liberal," and even "crooked." This harsh political climate has made the judicial role more contentious than ever.

The criticisms aren't just from those in power. Websites like The Robing Room are filled with harsh feedback for judges, some of it from disgruntled litigants, challenging the integrity and capability of those on the bench.

The personal risks can be chilling: in 2020, Judge Esther Salas experienced a horrific attack at her home, which tragically resulted in the death of her son and serious injury to her husband. This and other attacks have led to significant conversations about the security and privacy of judges.

Given these circumstances, the once-revered position of a judge now comes with increased scrutiny and danger. The role demands a thick skin and a philosophical resilience to both public criticism and personal risk.

In an era where respect and polite conduct are often overshadowed by harsh rhetoric and political agendas, the fundamental question remains for any aspiring judge: In today’s fraught environment, is ascending to the bench a goal worth pursuing, or is it a path fraught with more peril than prestige?