In a recent edition of Heather Cox Richardson's "Letters from an American," a spotlight was thrown on some of the more contentious moments and decisions from Donald Trump's presidency. One notable instance was when Mitt Romney, the 2012 Republican presidential nominee, was branded by Trump as a “Democrat secret asset” after Romney voted to convict Trump in his impeachment trial. This accusation prompted a reevaluation of party loyalties and raised eyebrows across the political spectrum.

Furthermore, the administration's decision to use military force against suspected drug-smugglers' boats in Venezuela has stirred significant legal and ethical debates. John Yoo, known for his controversial legal opinions during the Bush administration, criticized the broad military powers being claimed, emphasizing the necessity of distinguishing between crime and acts of war.

Another intriguing development reported by Bloomberg Law involved the Department of Labor’s “Fork in the Road” initiative, which allowed employees to take extended leaves at full pay and later return to their same positions. This raised questions about governmental efficiency and the use of taxpayer dollars.

The Trump administration also faced criticism for its handling of the immigration system. After reducing the number of immigration judges, Trump proposed using military lawyers from the JAG Corps to handle immigration cases, a move questioned for its legality and practicality, given the specialized nature of immigration law.

Trump's approach to urban crime also came under scrutiny. His strategy to deploy the National Guard in cities he described as "crime-ridden hellholes" led to debates over the effectiveness and appropriateness of using military forces for civilian law enforcement, compared to potentially increasing federal support for local police forces.

This series of events and decisions continues to fuel discussions among Trump supporters and critics alike. Each policy and claim from Trump’s term prompts citizens to question and critique the blending of political rhetoric and actual governance. As the political landscape evolves, these discussions remain crucial in evaluating the past actions and future implications of Trump’s administration policies.