In a striking development, lower courts are now being nudged to align their decisions more closely with the Supreme Court's shadow docket, a less transparent process that expedites certain rulings without full explanation. This approach has sparked controversy as it often bypasses the comprehensive deliberation typical of the higher court's usual proceedings. Critics argue that this undermines the judicial process by prioritizing speed over clarity and public scrutiny. More details can be found [here](https://abovethelaw.com/2025/09/supreme-courts-shadow-docket-scam-collides-with-reality/).

Meanwhile, in a lighter vein, summer associates have spoken, and their verdict provides a fresh perspective on the best Biglaw firms to work for during the summer season. This insider view helps aspiring lawyers gauge where they might want to launch their careers, blending professional growth with an enjoyable work environment. The full rankings are available [here](https://abovethelaw.com/2025/09/the-best-biglaw-firms-ranked-by-summer-associates-2025/).

On a more educational note, seasoned Supreme Court litigator Neal Katyal has opened up about the invaluable lessons he has learned from his extensive career arguing before the highest court in the land. His insights offer a rare peek into the strategies that can sway the nation’s most critical legal decisions. Interested readers can find his reflections [here](https://abovethelaw.com/2025/09/the-rainmaker-what-20-years-in-supreme-court-practice-have-taught-me/).

In the political arena, former President Donald Trump has made headlines again by demanding that Microsoft dismiss an in-house attorney, citing her previous work engagements as the reason. This move highlights Trump's continued influence and his willingness to engage in battles that underscore his personal vendettas. The full story is documented [here](https://abovethelaw.com/2025/09/donald-trump-demands-microsoft-fire-in-house-counsel-because-his-petty-need-for-revenge-knows-no-bounds/).

Lastly, the legal spotlight shines on DLA Piper as the firm faces a lawsuit alleging pregnancy discrimination. This case, set to be decided by a jury, could have significant implications for employment law and the firm’s own policies regarding maternity leave. More on this developing story can be found [here](https://abovethelaw.com/2025/09/dla-piper-sued-over-alleged-pregnancy-bias/).

Each of these stories reflects different facets of the legal world, from the opaque mechanisms of the Supreme Court to the individual experiences of those within the nation's top law firms. As these narratives unfold, they continue to shape the landscape of American law and its overarching impact on society.