Kathryn Dennis, known from her days on *Southern Charm*, is entangled not only in a DUI criminal case but also a hefty civil lawsuit. The suit stems from a May 2024 incident involving a three-car collision where Dennis is accused of driving under the influence, resulting in injuries and damages.

Court filings reveal the plaintiff, driving a 2012 Honda, was struck as a result of Dennis’ 2018 GMC truck hitting a 2017 Nissan, which then collided with the plaintiff’s car. Allegations suggest Dennis was impaired, failed to slow down, and did not maintain a proper lookout. Her insurer, State Farm, is also named in the lawsuit seeking both punitive and compensatory damages.

A mugshot of Dennis (Photo: Berkeley County Sheriff) accompanies reports from police at the scene who noted signs of impairment, including glossy eyes and the smell of alcohol, alongside several mini liquor bottles in her vehicle. Dennis has since been sentenced to 30 days in jail for the DUI related to the crash, although State Farm denies the allegations.

The civil suit underlines the serious ramifications of DUI beyond criminal proceedings in South Carolina. Victims can seek damages for medical costs, pain and suffering, and property damage in civil court, and potentially punitive damages aimed to punish reckless behavior.

Dennis' status as a public figure could intensify her personal liability, especially if punitive damages exceed insurance coverage due to her actions being deemed especially reckless.

South Carolina law mandates that civil trials for punitive damages are bifurcated, assessing compensatory damages first. For punitive damages, the plaintiff must prove the defendant's conduct was willful or reckless beyond a reasonable doubt. The state caps punitive damages but makes exceptions for DUI cases, possibly allowing higher claims against Dennis.

Factors like the defendant's past behavior, ability to pay, and existing criminal penalties are considered when awarding punitive damages. The statute of limitations for such claims is three years from the date of the incident.

This case not only tests the boundaries of legal liability in DUI incidents but also puts a spotlight on the broader implications for insurance coverage in cases involving intoxication and recklessness. As this high-profile lawsuit unfolds, it could set precedents for how similar cases are handled in South Carolina and beyond.