October 17, 2025

In a controversial move back in May, former President Donald Trump unilaterally declared the elimination of the $2.75 billion Digital Equity Act, branding it as "racist" and "unconstitutional." This law, integral to the infrastructure bill, was designed to extend broadband grants and digital literacy resources across America, benefiting a broad spectrum of citizens including rural veterans and residents who are typically Trump supporters.
Despite its wide-reaching benefits, the Trump administration's misunderstanding of the term "equity" as favoring minorities led to the abrupt scrapping of the program. This decision has sparked legal action; in June, a coalition of 20 states filed a lawsuit against the administration, asserting that the president does not have the authority to unilaterally dismantle an act of Congress or freeze the allocated funding.
This week, the National Digital Inclusivity Alliance (NDIA) added to the legal pressure by filing another lawsuit. They argue that the freezing of these funds not only violates the separation of powers outlined in the Constitution but also severely impacts various community programs that were dependent on this funding. The NDIA was set to utilize a $25.7 million grant from the Act to facilitate internet connectivity through 13 programs across 11 states, aiding in digital literacy for seniors and veterans.
The termination of the Digital Equity Act has broader implications than just the cessation of funding. It has left numerous groups vulnerable, particularly the elderly who are increasingly targeted by online scams. These community groups, which were to benefit from the Act, now find themselves without support due to what the NDIA describes as actions by "racist zealots."
Trump's stance has been to publicly minimize the impact of his decisions, claiming they predominantly affect Democratic programs and supporters. However, the reality shows a bipartisan group of citizens suffering from these cuts, including those in Republican strongholds.
The ongoing lawsuits and public outcry highlight a critical debate over presidential powers and the safeguarding of bipartisan legislative achievements intended to bolster the nation's digital infrastructure and literacy. As these legal battles unfold, the true extent of the impact on American communities, governance, and digital inclusivity continues to come into sharper focus.
For more law-related stories, visit [Above the Law](https://abovethelaw.com).