October 23, 2025

A significant legal battle is underway as Benjamin Chow and Hayden Davis, founders of Meteora and Kelsier Labs, face accusations in a federal class action lawsuit. The case, filed in the Southern District of New York, alleges that the duo orchestrated a pump-and-dump scheme with meme coins $MELANIA and $LIBRA, leading to substantial investor losses.
The complaint outlines a grim scenario where the MELANIA coin, heavily promoted on Melania Trump’s social media, surged in value before crashing 98%, plummeting from $13.73 to a mere $0.18. The lawsuit claims insiders, connected to Chow and Davis, capitalized on this by dumping their holdings and netting approximately $10 million from the collapse of $MELANIA alone. Similarly, the LIBRA token, linked to promotions by Argentine President Javier Milei, saw over $107 million offloaded before its price also tanked.
The legal proceedings are not merely about the financial losses incurred but are poised to set a precedent on how U.S. securities laws apply to fraudulent activities within the decentralized finance sector. The heart of the case involves the application of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5, which addresses fraud in securities transactions.
David Silver, a seasoned attorney in federal crypto-fraud cases, emphasized the underlying issue: “When promoters and insiders manipulate token prices for personal gain, it’s not innovation — it’s fraud. The SEC and the courts have made clear that the substance of conduct, not the label on the token, determines liability.”
This case also casts a spotlight on the responsibilities of public figures in crypto promotions. Both Melania Trump and Javier Milei, while not defendants, are alleged to have unwittingly lent credibility to these schemes, which the lawsuit argues played a pivotal role in enticing investors. The legal community and regulatory bodies, including the SEC and FTC, are watching closely, as outcomes here could demand more stringent disclosure requirements for celebrity endorsements in the crypto space.
The implications of this lawsuit extend beyond immediate legal outcomes. If the plaintiffs prevail, it could lead to a regulatory overhaul affecting how meme coins and similar speculative digital assets are handled on U.S. exchanges. Proposed legislations like the GENIUS Act and the Clarity Act aim to tighten controls, possibly curtailing the rampant speculation that has characterized much of the crypto market.
As the drama unfolds in court, the crypto industry and its observers are reminded that traditional legal frameworks still play a crucial role in the new digital frontier. The outcome here may well determine if the era of the so-called Wild West in crypto is coming to an end, aligning pioneering financial technologies more closely with established legal standards.