In a poignant declaration of moving forward, Bijou Phillips has initiated legal proceedings to change her daughter's surname from Fianna Francis Masterson to Fianna Francis Phillips. This action was taken shortly after her divorce from Danny Masterson was finalized on October 24, 2025, signaling a new chapter free from the shadows of Masterson's criminal past.

Two years post Masterson’s sentencing of 30 years to life for rape, Phillips’s bid to alter her daughter's surname underscores the profound impact of his crimes on his family. This legal maneuver reflects a desire to shield her daughter from the potential stigma attached to the Masterson name, as the former "That ’70s Show" star continues to serve his sentence at North Kern State Prison.

The California Superior Court is now tasked with deciding whether the name change would serve the best interest of the child, considering factors like potential psychological harm and social stigma associated with retaining the Masterson surname.

Despite his incarceration, Masterson retains parental rights and can contest the name change, potentially leading to a complex legal showdown. This scenario places significant emphasis on the "Best Interest of the Child" standard, a cornerstone in family law that prioritizes a child’s welfare over parental preferences or rights.

Sources close to Phillips describe her as deeply committed to her daughter’s well-being, amidst navigating the fallout from Masterson's criminal proceedings. Phillips, now linked romantically with businessman Jamie Mazur, is focused on providing a stable and nurturing environment for Fianna.

As this case unfolds, it will not only determine a young girl’s surname but also set a precedent for how deeply a parent’s criminal convictions can influence decisions about a child's identity and welfare in the public eye.

For those facing similar dilemmas, this situation highlights the importance of documenting any adverse effects related to a child’s current surname, to bolster legal arguments centered around the child's best interests.

This case continues to garner attention, symbolizing a significant moment in the intersection of criminal law and family rights, reminding us of the enduring impact of one’s actions on their loved ones.