In a surprising move from the White House, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has suspended two lawyers for declining to refer to the January 6 Capitol event as "enthusiastic tourism" instead of a riot. This directive aligns with a broader pattern of controversial legal interpretations and actions by the government, sparking discussions about freedom of speech and the politicization of legal terms.

Meanwhile, in a lighter twist of fate, a furloughed IRS lawyer has turned his downtime into an opportunity by opening a hot dog stand. Amid financial uncertainty, his entrepreneurial spirit highlights how individuals are adapting to the shutdown's impacts on their careers.

In corporate law, the trend of working from home continues to evolve. A top Biglaw firm has announced a new policy requiring associates to be in the office four days a week starting in 2026, hinting at a slow return to pre-pandemic office environments but still acknowledging the lasting impact of remote work.

The political landscape is also experiencing shifts, with government lawyers nonchalantly discussing the possibility of former President Trump serving a third term—a statement that casually overlooks the 22nd Amendment, which limits presidents to two terms.

Former FBI Director James Comey is seeking dismissal of a case against him, which he criticizes as baseless. His legal team has provided multiple reasons for the case's dismissal, emphasizing the need for judicial prudence and the avoidance of politically motivated charges.

In educational law, a new rule from the Department of Education may significantly impact public interest lawyers. The rule redefines eligibility for loan forgiveness, potentially excluding many types of public service legal work. This has raised concerns about the future of legal aid and advocacy under the new administration.

Lastly, the legal community is bracing for technological changes with AI threatening to disrupt the traditional billable hour model. Law firms are exploring automation and its implications, signaling a potential overhaul in how legal services are priced and delivered.

Together, these stories paint a picture of a legal landscape at a crossroads between tradition and change, highlighting the adaptability of legal professionals in a rapidly evolving world.