In a recent surge of opinionated discourse, conservative commentator Helen Andrews has sparked a debate by asserting that the legal profession, among others, is being detrimentally feminized due to prevailing "wokeness". Andrews argues that this shift prioritizes traditionally feminine traits such as empathy and cohesion over the masculine values of rationality and competition, which she claims are essential for the survival of the rule of law.

Andrews posits that such feminization leads to a culture where cancel culture thrives, as it aligns with female patterns of behavior that emphasize safety and consensus over risk and conflict. She suggests that this cultural shift could endanger the foundational principles of law, such as the adherence to precedent and the impartial application of justice, under the influence of empathetic appeals.

Contrary to Andrews' perspective, many in the legal field celebrate the increased presence and influence of women. The evolving dynamics are seen not as a feminization with negative connotations but as a humanization of the workspace. This shift reflects a broader societal progression towards inclusivity and equality, rather than the gendered downfall that Andrews describes.

The fear that the rule of law might not withstand this so-called feminization seems unfounded when scrutinized against the backdrop of a still predominantly male and conservative Supreme Court. Furthermore, the notion that women inherently bring a detrimental empathy to the legal process overlooks the capacities of women lawyers who have advanced in their careers through merit and hard work, often battling against the systemic biases that still favor the old boys’ club mentality.

Andrews also calls for a return to a "masculine office culture," hinting at a more aggressive, less inclusive workplace environment. This perspective not only undermines the strides made towards gender equality but also ignores the negative aspects of such a culture, which often includes bullying and other exclusionary practices.

Ultimately, the discussion shouldn't hinge on whether the legal profession is becoming too feminine or masculine, but rather on how it can continue to evolve to reflect fairness, equality, and justice for all, irrespective of gender. The real question is not about the feminization of the legal profession but about its adaptation to contemporary societal values that prioritize diversity and inclusivity over outdated stereotypes.