Vanderbilt University, often touted as the “Harvard of the South,” might be facing a bit of an identity crisis, or at least a civics education crisis, according to recent events. This morning, Vanderbilt’s quarterback, Diego Pavia, made headlines by asking former President Donald Trump via social media to issue an "Executive Order" to expand the college football playoffs by four more teams. This move, theoretically, would allow Vanderbilt, with its 10-2 record, a shot at the playoffs.

Pavia, who is in his sixth year of college football and currently pursuing a Master’s degree at Vanderbilt, seems to have a shaky grasp on the actual powers of a presidential executive order. Executive orders, contrary to what some may believe, cannot override existing laws or command independent organizations like the NCAA to alter sports playoffs configurations.

The confusion doesn't stop at the quarterback’s level. Notably, a Miami Law School graduate and current cabinet secretary echoed a similar sentiment, suggesting that President Trump could intervene in college football playoff structures—a stark misrepresentation of presidential powers.

This incident isn't just a quirky sports news item; it's reflective of a larger issue regarding American civics education. Professor Lindsey Cormack, author and researcher, points out that the U.S. spends minimally on civics education compared to other subjects. This underfunding is becoming increasingly evident as even individuals in high academic and political positions display fundamental misunderstandings of government functions.

The Trump administration has been characterized by a flurry of executive orders, often stretching the boundaries of constitutional authority. This has led to numerous legal challenges and a growing public perception that presidential orders can enact sweeping changes akin to legislative actions, a belief that is constitutionally inaccurate.

The suggestion that the president could directly influence NCAA decisions is part of a broader, more dangerous implication: that presidential powers are far more extensive than they actually are. This misconception, when played out in the public arena over something as nationally engaging as college football, could further misconstrue public understanding of the executive branch’s role.

As this debate unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the critical need for robust civics education. Understanding the foundational principles of governance is essential, not just for the electorate, but also for those in positions of influence who might perpetuate harmful myths about the scope of presidential power. As it stands, the blend of sports enthusiasm and political misunderstanding is a potent mix that could mislead the public about the very nature of their government.