December 15, 2025

In a disturbing revelation that seems ripped from an authoritarian playbook, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) recently made headlines for inadvertently publishing a 'watch list' of immigration lawyers on its website. The list, discovered by attorney Arlene Amarante who unexpectedly found her own name among the entries, has since been removed. However, its brief appearance has triggered a wave of concern across the legal community and beyond.
Arlene Amarante, along with many others, was taken aback not just by the existence of such a list, but by its peculiar composition—many of those listed were practitioners of color. This detail escalates the issue from a mere breach of privacy to a potential act of racial profiling and discrimination.
ICE's actions have prompted Al Otro Lado, a leading immigration advocacy group, to file a Freedom of Information Act request. They seek clarity on who initiated the list, the reasons behind its creation, and why immigration attorneys were being cataloged. The concern is that this might represent a broader strategy of intimidation and political targeting by the administration, which has shown a pattern of hostility towards immigration lawyers and advocates.
The controversy aligns uncomfortably with a March 2025 memo from the White House titled "Preventing Abuses of the Legal System and the Federal Court," which critics argue undermines the legal profession by accusing immigration attorneys of unscrupulous practices. This hostile stance has alarmed many in the legal field, prompting fears that defending constitutional rights and holding the government accountable is being misconstrued as harmful.
Legal experts and advocates are particularly troubled by the implications of this list. Andrew Fels, a staff attorney at Al Otro Lado, emphasized the absence of a legitimate reason for such a monitoring system. Meanwhile, Cassandra Lopez, the group’s legal director, remarked on the chilling resemblance to past government overreaches, where legal professionals found themselves targeted simply for performing their duties.
The unfolding situation underscores a severe challenge to the rule of law and the essential role of attorneys in ensuring justice and accountability in the immigration system. It raises profound questions about the balance of power, the protection of civil liberties, and the state of democracy itself. As this story develops, the legal community and civil rights organizations are on high alert, ready to defend the fundamental principles that underpin American justice.