December 19, 2025

In the often cutthroat world of business trademarks, a small Newfane-based company, Better Wheel Workshops, found themselves at the losing end of a trademark dispute with the Koozie Group, a large corporation from Clearwater, Florida. The dispute centered around Better Wheel Workshops’ wooden drink sleeve product originally named "The Woodzie," which the Koozie Group argued infringed on their trademark for "koozie."
For about a decade, the husband and wife team behind Better Wheel Workshops produced their wooden can insulators under the Woodzie name. However, about a year-and-a-half ago, they were informed by the Koozie Group that their product name was too similar to their trademark, leading to a petition filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to cancel the Woodzie trademark due to potential confusion.
Facing significant legal fees and the daunting prospect of a prolonged legal battle, the small business owners decided to rename their product to "Tree Sleeve." They are currently in the process of rebranding, including updating their website and notifying wholesale partners of the change. The transition to the new name must be completed by the end of the year.
The situation raises questions about the fairness of trademark laws, especially when it comes to small businesses facing off against larger corporations with deeper pockets. Many other companies use the term “koozie” in various contexts, which complicates the issue further. The original term "koozie" itself is believed to have derived from "tea cozy," a British term, suggesting that the creativity in naming might not be as unique as presumed.
This case highlights the challenges and costs that small businesses often face in trademark disputes. Despite the lack of clear customer confusion between the two products, the financial burden of legal defense often makes it more feasible for smaller entities to change course rather than fight. Such situations underscore the need for more balanced mechanisms to protect small businesses in trademark disputes.