The climate of hostility towards federal judges is reaching unprecedented levels, with both Democratic and Republican-appointed judges facing severe backlash. This backlash intensifies especially when their rulings obstruct former President Donald Trump’s agendas. Recently, the escalation took a more troubling turn with House Speaker Mike Johnson’s controversial comments on impeachment as a tool against judges.

Johnson, who had earlier shown restraint about impeachment discussions, took a starkly different stance last week. In a candid moment, he expressed outright support for impeaching judges who rule against the Trump administration, stating, “I’m for it.” This marks a significant shift from his previous position, where impeachment was considered an "extreme measure."

The Speaker’s rhetoric did not stop at mere support. He further suggested that it was necessary to "lay down the law" and "make an example" of judges who deviate from their expected roles. Such statements, while potentially popular in right-wing circles, pose serious threats to the independence and safety of the judiciary.

The danger is more than theoretical. There has been a 327% increase in threats against federal judges during the Trump II era. Tactics like bullying and intimidation have become alarmingly mainstream, and Johnson’s casual approach to impeachment only exacerbates the problem. When political leaders treat judicial reprisal as normal, it sends a dangerous signal to the most extreme elements of society.

The backdrop of these comments is equally concerning. The U.S. Marshals have seen a record number of investigations due to threats against judges. Increased security measures have been implemented, and judges now work under the constant fear for their safety and that of their families.

It is crucial to remember that impeachment was never designed as a tool for correcting legal disagreements or as a substitute for appellate review. It should not be wielded as a weapon of political dissatisfaction or intimidation. Yet, the current political discourse, led by figures like Speaker Johnson, seems to advocate just that—a viewpoint sharply divergent from the principles of judicial independence and accountability.

This approach by the GOP not only undermines the judiciary but also threatens the very fabric of American democratic governance by promoting a culture of sustained pressure and consequences for judges who do not rule in favor of a particular political agenda. It is a move that could have long-lasting detrimental effects on the rule of law in the United States.