February 10, 2026


Biglaw Firm Cooley Innovates Legal Recruitment by Prioritizing Student Experience

For the first time in recent memory, a significant change in law firm recruiting practices is set to benefit law students directly. Cooley, a notable Biglaw firm, has decided to overhaul its recruitment strategy by delaying a portion of its hiring decisions, allowing students more time to understand their career paths before committing.

Traditionally, law firms have rushed to secure their future associate classes early, often targeting first-year law students (1Ls) who have barely scratched the surface of their legal education. This practice has long been criticized for placing undue pressure on students to make premature, potentially life-altering professional decisions.

Cooley's new approach breaks from this norm. As reported by Bloomberg Law, the firm will still extend some offers to 1Ls for their 2027 summer program. However, it plans to fill 30-40% of its 2028 class slots only after these candidates have completed their first year, with additional hires from the often-overlooked third-year law student (3L) pool.

Carrie Wagner, Cooley’s chief talent officer, emphasized that this change aims to widen the scope of potential candidates over time, rather than making hurried decisions based purely on early interactions. This shift acknowledges a prevalent issue within Biglaw recruiting - the high-speed, high-pressure environment that forces students into quick decisions without sufficient understanding of their preferences or the legal field itself.

The revamp comes as a response to the disruption caused by COVID-19, which saw a collapse in traditional on-campus recruitment processes and an acceleration of hiring timelines controlled by firms. This left many students overwhelmed, having to apply for competitive positions prematurely and often without complete information about different legal practices or their own long-term interests.

Cooley's strategy not only aims to provide relief from this intense pressure but also intends to create a more thoughtful and informed recruitment process. This is a move towards what could be seen as a more student-centered approach, potentially setting a precedent for other firms in the industry.

This development is a refreshing shift in an industry known for its rigorous and often inflexible recruitment practices. By allowing students more time to mature into their legal careers, Cooley is offering what can truly be considered a rare win for law students. As the legal industry continues to evolve, perhaps more firms will follow in Cooley's footsteps, adopting more humane and considerate recruiting strategies that align better with the needs of future legal professionals.