February 12, 2026


Trump Administration's Pressure Leads to Suspension of Key Biglaw Diversity Program

In a significant blow to diversity efforts in the legal industry, the Mansfield certification, a major initiative promoting diverse leadership in law firms, has been put on pause. This comes in the wake of aggressive scrutiny by the Trump administration, leveraging federal agencies to challenge the program's legality.

Diversity Lab, the organization behind Mansfield certification, announced the suspension following a barrage of warning letters from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to 42 prominent law firms. These letters suggest that participation in the Mansfield certification could potentially breach antitrust laws—a claim that leading antitrust experts vigorously dispute.

The FTC's actions have caused a ripple effect of concern among Biglaw firms, historically known for their high-stakes billing but less so for their fortitude in political confrontations. Instead of defending their diversity policies or challenging the administration's stance, many firms have opted to retreat. This reaction has placed Diversity Lab in a precarious financial position, as Caren Ulrich Stacy, founder of Diversity Lab, highlighted in a client communication. Stacy noted the organization is facing severe financial strain due to decreased client engagement and the costs associated with responding to various legal challenges initiated by the government.

The chilling effect of the Trump administration's campaign against Mansfield certification extends beyond immediate financial implications. It represents a broader attack on diversity and inclusion efforts within the legal sector, undermining years of progress towards more equitable representation in law firm leadership. The administration's approach has not only questioned the legality of the Mansfield certification but has also instilled a pervasive fear of retribution across Biglaw, deterring firms from participating in or defending crucial diversity initiatives.

Despite the setback, Stacy remains committed to the cause, promising to keep stakeholders informed as they navigate these turbulent waters. However, the broader implications of this development are disheartening for advocates of diversity and inclusion. The situation underscores a grim reality: in the face of governmental intimidation, the commitment to diversity may be wavering among some of the most powerful law firms in the country.

As the legal community watches this unfold, the future of diversity initiatives like Mansfield certification hangs in the balance, dependent not only on legal battles but also on the moral resolve of Biglaw to stand up against efforts that seek to regress hard-won progress.