In a recent deposition that has social media buzzing, Les Wexner, the billionaire behind Victoria’s Secret, found himself in a tight spot which quickly escalated thanks to his lawyer’s hot mic moment. Michael Levy, Wexner’s attorney, was caught saying, “I’ll f-ing kill you if you answer another question with more than five words, OK?” This statement has ignited a firestorm of reactions online, dividing opinions sharply between legal experts and the general public.

The incident occurred during a House Oversight deposition where Wexner, like many before him, began to ramble. Levy’s intervention, albeit explosive, underscores a familiar frustration in legal circles about managing client responses during critical testimonies. While some attorneys empathized, recognizing the pressure to keep responses concise and relevant, many non-lawyers viewed the comment as a stark example of how the wealthy manipulate legal proceedings to their advantage.

This is not the first time a high-profile deposition has devolved into controversy. The deposition echoes past incidents, such as former LA Clippers owner Donald Sterling’s infamous testimony in 2003, which similarly showcased how quickly these legal proceedings could turn theatrical.

The broader implications of the deposition and Levy’s comments highlight ongoing discussions about power dynamics and accountability in legal settings, particularly involving influential figures. The public’s reaction is also fueled by Wexner’s past connections with Jeffrey Epstein, adding layers of complexity and scrutiny to how billionaires like Wexner navigate legal landscapes.

As the dust settles, this incident will likely serve as yet another example in the annals of legal studies on how not to manage a high-stakes deposition. Whether this will impact Wexner’s legal standing or merely remain a cautionary tale about attorney-client interactions remains to be seen.