February 23, 2026

Welcome to this week's Legal Ethics Roundup, your go-to source for the captivating, haunting, inspiring, and surprising news in the world of legal ethics. Let's dive into the top headlines that shaped the legal landscape last week.
ABA Issues New Opinion on Judicial Ethics
The American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility recently released Formal Opinion 521, offering guidance on the ethical obligations of judges beyond the courtroom. This opinion emphasizes the need for impartiality, integrity, and independence in administrative decisions to enhance public confidence in the judiciary’s integrity.
Supreme Court Adopts Automated Recusal Software
In a move to modernize and remove bias, the Supreme Court announced the adoption of automated software to assist justices in deciding when to recuse themselves from cases to avoid ethical conflicts. This software, which some lower courts already use, matches case parties against a list of individuals and organizations that justices have ties with.
Illinois Lawmakers Propose Restrictions on Private Equity in Law Firms
Reacting to concerns over the influence of private equity in the legal sector, Illinois lawmakers are pushing legislation to limit non-lawyer ownership of law firms. This move aims to protect attorney independence and ensure that financial interests do not compromise client care.
Legal Fees Hit Record Highs
A report highlights that top lawyers’ fees have surged, with some senior partners at large U.S. law firms charging up to $3,400 per hour. Factors driving this increase include a competitive talent market and the high stakes involved in litigation and corporate deal-making.
ABA Takes Steps to Protect Rights Under Guardianship
Following high-profile cases like Britney Spears’, the ABA has revised its ethics rules to ensure lawyers advocate for their clients’ wishes, even when under guardianship or conservatorship, highlighting a significant step towards protecting vulnerable individuals.
Controversy Surrounds the Mansfield Rule
The Federal Trade Commission has issued warning letters to 42 law firms participating in the Mansfield Rule program, which aims to improve diversity at senior levels within law firms. The FTC suggests that these DEI efforts could potentially threaten competition by influencing salary and benefits standards.
AI and Legal Document Privilege
Judge Rakoff of the Southern District of New York ruled that documents generated by AI are not protected by privilege, setting a precedent that may affect how legal professionals use AI tools in preparing case documents.
Ethics Query Over High-Value Gift to Top Lawyer
Goldman Sachs’ top lawyer faced scrutiny for accepting a $9,350 handbag from Jeffrey Epstein. While not strictly unethical under current rules, the incident raises questions about judgment and the adequacy of existing ethical guidelines regarding gifts.
Guidance on AI in Legal Practice Issued
The National Center for State Courts released a guide on responsibly using AI in legal practice, addressing the potential risks and responsibilities of over-relying on AI-generated outputs.
Rethinking Law School Accreditation
Amidst various changes, the ABA is engaging in a comprehensive review of law school accreditation standards, including discussions on diversity standards and alternative licensure pathways, reflecting ongoing efforts to adapt legal education to contemporary needs.
As we observe these unfolding developments, it's clear that the landscape of legal ethics continues to evolve, driven by technological advancements, societal shifts, and ongoing debates about the core values of the legal profession. Stay tuned for more updates in this fascinating intersection of law and ethics.