March 19, 2026


March Madness in the Legal World: Which Trump Administration Lawyer Should Lose Their License?

In a spirited nod to the NCAA Tournament, legal news website Above the Law has launched a unique bracket challenge that is stirring up the legal community. This year, instead of debating the merits of law schools or legal fictions, the spotlight turns to former Trump administration lawyers, asking: Which one most deserves to lose their license?

The premise is bold and stems from ongoing discussions about the ethical breaches allegedly committed by lawyers under Trump’s tenure. These include misleading tribunals, defying court orders, and other serious accusations that, if proven, could warrant severe disciplinary actions including disbarment.

The competition is structured around four regions, each named after a controversial figure associated with Trump's legal maneuvers. The Roy Cohn Region, for example, pays dubious homage to Trump's mentor, known for his aggressive tactics. Each region includes matchups between lawyers accused of various ethical violations, with readers invited to vote on who they believe is most deserving of disciplinary action.

One of the highlighted matchups features Pam Bondi, former Attorney General of the United States, who allegedly pressured DOJ lawyers to sidestep ethical norms. Bondi is up against James Percival, a former senior advisor at the Department of Homeland Security, accused of trying to manipulate legal narratives around sensitive cases.

Another notable pairing is Ed Martin, known for his controversial stint in the DOJ, against Brendan Carr, the FCC Chairman accused of using his position to influence media coverage unfavorably toward Trump's critics. The allegations against these figures range from misusing authority to outright coercion, painting a troubling picture of legal integrity at the highest levels of government.

The initiative by Above the Law not only highlights ongoing concerns about legal ethics in the Trump administration but also engages the public in a broader conversation about accountability in the legal profession. By voting in these polls, readers contribute to a collective call for upholding the standards and responsibilities of legal practice.

Polls will close on Monday at 7:59 p.m. Eastern, and the legal community is watching closely. This unusual bracket may not change any legal standings directly, but it certainly puts the spotlight on the need for ethical integrity in law and the consequences of its breach. As the votes are tallied, this competition serves as a reminder that in the field of law, justice and accountability must lead the way.