March 24, 2026

If you’ve been keeping up with the legal industry's updates, you might have seen the recent entries in the American Lawyer Morning Update focused on the Middle East crisis. What’s notably stirring debate isn't just the geopolitical turmoil but how it's making Biglaw partners anxious about their financials—specifically their billable hours amidst the chaos.
This morning’s newsletter featured titles like “The Biggest Disruption Since Covid for Energy Lawyers” and “How Much Is the US and Israel’s War on Iran Affecting M&A?” These headlines, while capturing the legal disruptions, perhaps inadvertently spotlight the contrast between human suffering and financial inconvenience.
The narrative doesn’t stop at mere headlines. The imagery accompanying these articles—a plume of black smoke from an explosion and a destroyed apartment building—intensifies the narrative, pulling focus towards the economic impact on legal practices rather than the broader human or geopolitical implications.
However, one cannot help but notice a unique angle in the latter story that assigns direct agency to the U.S. and Israel for initiating the conflict. This not only frames the war in a stark, accusatory light but also connects it with the tangible consequences seen on ground—highlighted through the photo of the ruined residential structure in Iran.
Despite these striking elements, the core of the newsletter still orbits around the implications for the legal sector. Discussions range from the activation of evacuation plans for Biglaw firms in Dubai to the broader economic tremors felt by energy lawyers. Yet, these professional concerns are juxtaposed sharply against the backdrop of a war that's claiming lives and reshaping international relations.
The delicate balance needed in reporting such issues is evident. While the legal community will naturally hone in on how global events affect their work, the portrayal of these impacts needs careful handling to avoid seeming insensitive to the broader, far graver consequences of such conflicts.
Ultimately, the focus on billables might strike a discordant note for those facing the dire realities of war. But it also opens up a conversation on the intersection of global crises and professional sectors like Biglaw, shedding light on the far-reaching effects of international conflicts. This is a reminder that in the world of law, and elsewhere, global events can reverberate in unexpected ways, shaping practices and perspectives across the board.