April 17, 2026


This Week in Legal Land: Magicians, Trump Judges, and Tariff Refunds

In a unique turn of events, the famous magician duo Penn & Teller have stepped into the legal arena, filing an intriguing Supreme Court brief. They are challenging the reliability of 'investigative hypnosis' used in a death-penalty case in Texas, raising concerns about the scientific validity of such methods in the justice system. This remarkable case highlights the crossover between entertainment and law, as detailed by Adam Liptak in The New York Times.

Meanwhile, the judicial world saw some stir as judges appointed by former President Donald Trump expressed their dissent regarding the denial of a rehearing on COVID-19 bias. The case, covered by Quinn Wilson of Bloomberg Law, underscores ongoing tensions and differing opinions among judges concerning pandemic-related legislations and their implications.

In another headline-grabbing development, Linda Greenhouse, writing for The New York Times, boldly predicts a loss for Trump in a Supreme Court case concerning immigration. Known for her usually reserved stance on predictions, Greenhouse’s assertion adds a layer of intrigue and anticipation to the proceedings.

On the political front, the controversy surrounding the January 6 Capitol riot continues to influence decisions in Washington. Suzanne Monyak of Bloomberg Law reports that any candidate for Attorney General who supported the January 6 event would be considered 'Dead on Arrival' according to a key senator. This statement reflects the deep political divisions and the ongoing impact of the events of that day.

Sports and policy intersected when the Eighth Circuit addressed a challenge to Minnesota’s policy on trans athletes. The court’s decision, as reported by Ryan Luetkemeyer of Courthouse News Service, supported the inclusion of trans athletes, rejecting the challenge based on the claim that it might violate Title IX as the relevant Trump executive orders are not yet established law.

Lastly, in an update that will impact many, the process to refund tariffs related to Trump’s invalidated policies by the Supreme Court is set to begin next week. Lydia Wheeler of The Wall Street Journal provides insights into the government’s readiness to start processing claims, marking a significant step towards resolving a contentious trade issue.

For more details on these stories, visit Howard Bashman's 'How Appealing' blog, a dedicated space for appellate litigation news. These legal narratives not only reflect the complexities of law but also its intersection with daily life and broader societal issues.