April 27, 2026


Biglaw Strives to Balance Equity Without Creating Divisions Among Partners

In the competitive landscape of big law firms, maintaining a robust and economically viable equity partnership is paramount. Yet, the challenge persists: how to expand partnership opportunities without diluting the value of equity shares. Lorie Almon, chair and managing partner at Seyfarth Shaw, recently shed light on this intricate balancing act in a discussion with the American Lawyer.

"It opens more doors and more opportunities when you have that [income] tier," Almon explained, emphasizing the advantages of creating a nonequity tier within firms. This approach allows firms to recognize and elevate top-performing lawyers without compromising the exclusivity and financial benefits of the equity partnership.

However, Almon was quick to address potential concerns about creating a hierarchical divide within the firm. She passionately clarified that at Seyfarth Shaw, all partners, regardless of their tier, are included in financial discussions and receive the same firm-wide communications. "We don’t see it as sort of—'the equity partners, who are the owners, and then other people who are not as valuable,'" Almon stated. This inclusive approach is crucial in ensuring that the system does not evolve into a 'caste system'.

The strategy of implementing multiple partnership tiers is increasingly viewed as a solution to various challenges faced by large law firms. It provides a pathway to partnership for more attorneys, potentially boosting morale and loyalty among the ranks. Moreover, it allows firms to manage their internal economics more flexibly, adapting to the dynamic demands of the legal market without undermining the firm's core financial structure.

As law firms continue to navigate the complexities of growth and market pressures, the conversation around equity and partnership structures is likely to evolve. Seyfarth Shaw's model of inclusive, tiered partnership offers a blueprint that other firms might consider as they plan their future in an ever-competitive field.

This nuanced approach to partnership underscores a fundamental trend in Biglaw: the need to innovate within traditional frameworks to remain competitive and fair. By fostering a culture of inclusivity and transparency, firms can ensure that their drive to protect equity does not inadvertently marginalize talented attorneys who are crucial to their success.