June 23, 2026

In a bold statement to law.com, Ira Coleman, Chair of McDermott, Will & Schulte, has articulated a clear vision on how artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to redefine the role of associates in the legal sector, commonly referred to as Biglaw. Contrary to the dystopian view that AI might render human lawyers obsolete, Coleman suggests a future where AI acts as a differentiator among associates, amplifying the capabilities of those who can master it.
Coleman’s remarks underscore an inevitable pivot in the legal profession: "AI is not going to replace associates. AI will replace associates who don’t know how to use AI," he declared. This paradigm shift suggests that the future of law isn’t about displacement by technology but rather about integration, demanding a new kind of proficiency among law practitioners.
The chair’s perspective is a call to action for current and future legal professionals. He questions the readiness of associate classes across the board, highlighting AI proficiency as a disruptive force that could either make or break careers. This technology, according to Coleman, is not just a tool but a potential accelerant for those who are adept, promising significant rewards and recognition from top-tier firms for those who can leverage AI effectively early in their careers.
Moreover, Coleman discusses the implications of AI on client billing and service quality. He points out that tasks which can be automated or handled by AI, like those producing low-value outputs that tools such as ChatGPT can generate, should not be billed to clients. This shift stresses the importance of associates who can add real value beyond what AI can offer. "You must be adding judgment, angle, and know how things affect a business or how it helps them win," Coleman asserts.
This transformation in the legal landscape demands a higher caliber of legal service, where the role of an associate evolves to meet higher expectations of analytical depth and strategic insight. It’s a world where AI tools are not just aids but also benchmarks that differentiate the essential human contribution in legal proceedings.
As AI continues to permeate various sectors, its integration into the legal field through platforms and tools promises to reshape the profession. Associates who can navigate this new terrain, using AI not just as a back-office utility but as a front-line advantage, are likely to thrive.
Coleman’s insights not only highlight a significant shift in operational norms within Biglaw but also serve as a strategic guide for upcoming legal professionals. As AI reshapes the landscape, the ultimate value provided by legal experts will increasingly rely on their ability to synergize their human judgment with machine efficiency, setting a new standard in the legal profession.