July 27, 2026


Death Threats Plague DOJ Attorney After Senate Testimony; Senators Hawley and Schmitt Criticized for Incendiary Behavior

Elizabeth Oyer, a former pardoning attorney for the Department of Justice who served for 13 years, has found herself the target of severe harassment and death threats following her recent Senate Judiciary Committee testimony. Last week, Oyer testified against Todd Blanche, the nominee for Attorney General, claiming she was dismissed for refusing to restore firearm rights to Mel Gibson, a known associate of Donald Trump.

Following her testimony, Oyer revealed through a YouTube video the barrage of menacing emails she received, including threats to her life and her family. The emails featured messages like "Die in hell you pos," and "Let's hope somebody murders your family and gets clemency."

During the hearing, rather than focusing on the nominee, Senators Josh Hawley and Eric Schmitt, both Republicans from Missouri, grilled Oyer about her recommendations to President Biden to commute 40 federal death sentences. They presented her with photos of victims related to the crimes of those she recommended for commutation, a move Oyer later described in her video as senators "rage-baiting their followers into believing nasty and dangerous lies."

Senator Hawley responded to the backlash regarding his conduct during the hearing by emphasizing that the "real victims" were those affected by the criminals recommended for clemency. He expressed pride in sharing their stories. Meanwhile, Senator Schmitt's office criticized Oyer's recommendations as "disgraceful" and extreme. Neither senator has addressed the issue of the death threats Oyer has received.

This incident is part of a disturbing trend where public officials, after being targeted by administration officials, face violent threats from extremists. The pattern includes a significant rise in threats against judges, with a 327% increase reported between May 2024 and March 2025.

The confirmation hearing for Todd Blanche was marked by controversy and political performance, diverting from its intended purpose to a spectacle that jeopardized the safety of a witness. This event underscores the volatile nature of political discourse in the U.S. and raises serious concerns about the safety of individuals participating in the legislative process.