August 2, 2026


Bar Exam Chaos Across the U.S. and Unexpected Legal Sector Bonuses

In a stunning series of events, the bar exam's reliability across the United States has been thrown into question following multiple technological failures. In Washington state, approximately 645 bar exam candidates faced a significant setback when the July NextGen bar exam was abruptly canceled due to a hardware failure at the convention center. The candidates now have to wait until September for a makeup date, choose to take the exam in February 2027, or accept a refund.

This incident is part of a broader national issue. Even as California faced ridicule for its independent attempt at conducting the bar exam, it appears the traditional bar exam overseers haven't fared much better. The National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE) witnessed similar disruptions, underscoring a systemic failure rather than isolated incidents.

Maryland, however, experienced a minor victory amid the chaos. A technical issue at one test site was resolved in less than an hour, allowing the exam to proceed as scheduled — a situation that now looks like a win given the circumstances elsewhere.

Amidst this turmoil, the legal sector is seeing some financial uplifts. Milbank has kicked off the summer bonus season by announcing special bonuses for its associates and special counsel, ranging from $6,000 to $25,000, which will be payable by the end of August. This bold move by Milbank, not waiting for industry leader Cravath to set the precedent, marks the third consecutive year they have taken the initiative in bonus announcements.

In other legal industry news, Gibson Dunn made a significant play by hiring six litigation partners from Wachtell, including a prominent executive committee co-chair. However, the deal lost one potential partner after a controversial video surfaced.

Political and legal controversies continue to make headlines. Former President Trump missed the deadline to file for a rehearing on a significant birthright citizenship case, despite previous assurances of immediate action. In the Senate, Todd Blanche's confirmation is stalled as members demand assurances he's unwilling to provide.

Lastly, a legal debate surrounds Dr. Anthony Fauci, who is caught in a contentious investigation. Despite his pardon, which should theoretically prevent him from invoking the Fifth Amendment, there's a looming question over its applicability in what his defenders call a bad faith probe.

As the legal landscape continues to evolve with unexpected twists, both in the courtroom and beyond, these developments are sure to have lasting implications on the profession and its practices.